Politics OnLine home

Politics OnLine UK

Uk Politics

November 2005

Blog

Anglican schism threat

A watched society

Daylight robbery

October 2005

I believe in...

In a world gone mad

September 2005

Hurricane Katrina

June 2005

an idea whose time had come

March 2005

The world that  we created

Rule of law breached

Terrorism and Law

December 2004

A most terrible thing

Identity cards

The morality error

November 2004

Butt out

Hunt ban

Colin Powell resigns

October 2004

US election

Fahrenheit 9/11

Troop request not political

Intentions

Hostage killed

The personal is political

Jobz for the Boyz

Dear Mike, Iraq sucks

Tory conference 2004

The right is winning.

September 2004

Do what you will

De facto terrorism

Brutal honesty

Perish the thought

New Iraq war

The hunt

August 2004

Terrorism threat UK

July 2004

Hazel Blears MP

Geraldine Smith MP

Acts of terror

War and people

Fahrenheit 9/11

June 2004

The Sun

David Westwood

January 2004

Hutton report

Michael Howard's Tories?

Camp Xray

What is going on?

Protesters arrested

Hutton enquiry

Young people

Oh happy day!

Making a profit?

David Kelly

Row over 'sexed up' report

TA sent to Iraq

Crooks in suits

Dealing with Spam

Pensions outrage

Ink Cartridge scandal

Extradite and be damned

No confidence

Desperately seeking safety

Response to Mr Blair

Personal comments on the Bll of Rights

Bill of Rights

 

Uploaded: 09 March 2005

Terrorism, Law and the Home Arrest Bill.

The question has to be asked why a government who steadfastly refuse to release any credible information on the terrorist threat to the UK, is attempting to pass a law which will put the fate of suspected terrorists in the hands of the Home Secretary?

This is a landmark Bill and worth watching closely.

The judicial system in the UK is respected world wide for good reason. It doesn't always get it right and nor is it entirely just given that what decides the quality of representation any individual gets is hard cash, not justice and the judiciary is class ridden. That said, look around the world and our system is a pretty good one.

MP's are not impartial and one Home Secretary is no substitute for the judiciary and nor should that ever be the case. Many MP's have other jobs, directorships and the like, and how that affects their work as MP's has to be borne in mind whether they want us to or not.

Given the Iraq debacle, it is clear that MP's can get it spectacularly wrong and trust in Parliament has never been lower so attempting to take this action at this time is at best ill thought out and at worst entirely sinister and cynical.

Not one shred of credible information has been shared with us, the people, to suggest that terrorism is the national threat they would have us believe it is. Personally I do not believe that information exists. There is, however, a great deal of evidence that this and previous governments are seeking to increasingly centralize power to parliament and it has been going on for a long time.

Arrest, including Home Arrest, which is what this latest Bill is about, must be dealt with by experienced judges and the efforts of the government to place this responsibility in the hands of the Home Secretary resisted at all costs.

Angry lords savage terror bill.

Tories reject terror bill concessions.

Government wins terror vote.

Terror showdown with Lords looms.

Keith Lindsay-Cameron 2005

Please submit comments and suggestions to: