|
Uk Politics
November 2005
Blog
Anglican schism threat
A
watched society
Daylight
robbery
October 2005
I believe in...
In
a world gone mad
September 2005
Hurricane Katrina
June 2005
an idea whose time had come
March 2005
The world that we created
Rule of law breached
Terrorism and Law
December 2004
A
most terrible thing
Identity
cards
The morality error
November 2004
Butt out
Hunt
ban
Colin
Powell resigns
October 2004
US election
Fahrenheit 9/11
Troop
request not political
Intentions
Hostage killed
The
personal is political
Jobz for the
Boyz
Dear Mike, Iraq sucks
Tory conference 2004
The right is winning.
September 2004
Do
what you will
De
facto terrorism
Brutal
honesty
Perish
the thought
New
Iraq war
The hunt
August 2004
Terrorism
threat UK
July 2004
Hazel
Blears MP
Geraldine
Smith MP
Acts
of terror
War and people
Fahrenheit
9/11
June 2004
The Sun
David Westwood
January 2004
Hutton report
Michael Howard's Tories?
Camp Xray
What
is going on?
Protesters
arrested
Hutton
enquiry
Young
people
Oh
happy day!
Making
a profit?
David
Kelly
Row over 'sexed up' report
TA sent
to Iraq
Crooks
in suits
Dealing with
Spam
Pensions
outrage
Ink
Cartridge scandal
Extradite
and be damned
No
confidence
Desperately
seeking safety
Response
to Mr Blair
Personal comments on the Bll of
Rights
Bill of Rights
| |
Uploaded: 29 July 2003
Email to Hazel Blears MP
Sent 24 July 2004, as
yet, no reply.
Dear Hazel Blears,
I read an article in the Guardian with interest which said the we, the public, are to be advised to stock up on supplies of tinned food, bottled water and medical kits to help us through a terrorist attack.
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1264121,00.html
The article went on to say, you "said the terrorist threat was "serious" and "credible". (and) added: "It has increased and it is going to be with us for the long term."
Rather than just telling us what to do in order to be prepared for a terrorist attack, would you also share what credible information you have with us?
I am more than a little tired of being told what to do without a reasonable explanation of why. I am one of the many people who believed (knew beyond reasonable doubt) that the invasion of Iraq was unjustified and illegal. That two super powers could invade a sovereign nation which had not acted aggressively against another sovereign nation, did not confer the right.
Whether Tony Blair lied to us, or sexed up the information in the Iraq dossier is moot, as far as I am concerned, in the face of the monstrous arrogance of this country and America setting themselves up as the Worlds Police and acting pre-emptively, before a crime had been committed.
I hope that you will understand why, then, I am less than happy to accept your words that the threat of terrorism is 'serious' and 'credible', without proof. On your website it says, 'Have your say on the way forward for Britain.' If you mean that, then this is my say. I no longer trust this government, or anyone who endorsed the invasion of Iraq. As far as I have been able to ascertain, you voted for the invasion. I am a socialist, a socialism thought through and thoughtful, I hope, but in the next general election I will be completely at a loss. I could never vote for a party or any candidate that endorsed the invasion of Iraq. Iraq remains a central and decisive, and divisive, issue for me.
For me socialism means 'participative'. Not the benefactor of politics but a participant in politics. I want to be informed and if you have information that could inform me, I would very much like to hear it. A much bandied about phrase these days is, 'The Nanny State'. If the government does not want a Nanny State then it is the duty of you, and this government, to inform.
I await that information.
Yours very sincerely,
Keith Lindsay-Cameron
Please submit comments and suggestions to:
|