|
Uk Politics
November 2005
Blog
Anglican schism threat
A
watched society
Daylight
robbery
October 2005
I believe in...
In
a world gone mad
September 2005
Hurricane Katrina
June 2005
an idea whose time had come
March 2005
The world that we created
Rule of law breached
Terrorism and Law
December 2004
A
most terrible thing
Identity
cards
The morality error
November 2004
Butt out
Hunt
ban
Colin
Powell resigns
October 2004
US election
Fahrenheit 9/11
Troop
request not political
Intentions
Hostage killed
The
personal is political
Jobz for the
Boyz
Dear Mike, Iraq sucks
Tory conference 2004
The right is winning.
September 2004
Do
what you will
De
facto terrorism
Brutal
honesty
Perish
the thought
New
Iraq war
The hunt
August 2004
Terrorism
threat UK
July 2004
Hazel
Blears MP
Geraldine
Smith MP
Acts
of terror
War and people
Fahrenheit
9/11
June 2004
The Sun
David Westwood
January 2004
Hutton report
Michael Howard's Tories?
Camp Xray
What
is going on?
Protesters
arrested
Hutton
enquiry
Young
people
Oh
happy day!
Making
a profit?
David
Kelly
Row over 'sexed up' report
TA sent
to Iraq
Crooks
in suits
Dealing with
Spam
Pensions
outrage
Ink
Cartridge scandal
Extradite
and be damned
No
confidence
Desperately
seeking safety
Response
to Mr Blair
Personal comments on the Bll of
Rights
Bill of Rights
| |
Uploaded: 05 September 2003
Responses.
____________________________
Dear Sir
I found your comments about the Territorial Army deployment to the Gulf whilst browsing the Internet and would like to redress a couple of points.
Firstly, your friend was not conscripted, he volunteered to join the TA with no-one to force him into it. Conscription would mean he was legally forced, possibly against his will, to join the TA. When he signed up it should have been made quite clear that it is possible that he could be sent on operational duty anywhere in the world in order to support the Regular Army. In fact there are several forms that he will have read and signed acknowledging that he accepted this.
As a Royal Engineer (Volunteer) myself it is a fact that regardless of which arm of the army you are, be it a signaller, cook or driver etc, you are firstly a soldier (basic trained in infantry skills) then secondly a specialist soldier (in your friends case an engineer). He would not have been deployed unless he had passed the minimum requirement basic training and prior to entering the theatre of operation he would have undergone specialised training for that operation.
To illustrate this with a film you may have seen (Zulu), in the late 1800's a small contingent of Royal Engineers went to build a bridge at Rourkes Drift in Africa. They ended up being attacked by thousands of Zulu Warriors and quickly put aside their engineering skills and adopted their infantry skills to quell the attacks. Thereby relying upon their foundations as basic trained infantry soldiers.
If a TA soldier puts in the training there is no reason why he/she should be vast worlds apart from the regulars. Those who only turn up for the minimum training just to gain the annual bounty payment will be in for more of a shock if deployed. I am unsure of your friends background but I am sure he would agree with what I have said.
Of course he was "shitting himself" when he first went into that sort of situation. I will guarantee that the feeling would have been exactly the same for even the regular troops serving along side of him.
The Regular Army is severely under manned due to world wide commitments. The TA is trained and paid to fill in the gaps and to support a stretched regular force. If the TA were not to be deployed then in what capacity are they to be used? A TA soldier is paid quite well and with 40,000 TA soldiers plus buildings and equipment, that is a large amount of cash for the government to be spending for effectively a home guard. A home guard that will never be used as the last time I looked this country could not be invaded by any known force, unless you think the Germans are going to have another bash?
I trust this has helped you understand a little more about the TA.
Yours faithfully
R H
____________________________
© Keith Lindsay-Cameron 2003
Please submit comments and suggestions to:
|