|
| |
letter
by John Le Carre
John
Le Carre's Letter - The Times (
UK
)
January
15, 2003
The
United
States of America
has gone
mad.
By
John le Carre
America
has entered one of its periods of historical madness, but this is the worst I
can remember: worse than McCarthyism, worse than the
Bay
of Pigs
and in the long term potentially more disastrous than the Vietnam War. The
reaction to 9/11 is beyond anything Osama bin Laden could have hoped for in his
nastiest dreams. As in McCarthy times, the freedoms that have made
America
the envy of the world are being systematically eroded. The combination
of compliant
US
media and vested corporate interests is once more ensuring that a debate that
should be ringing out in every town square is confined to the loftier columns of
the East Coast press. The imminent war was planned years before bin Laden
struck, but it was he who made it possible. Without bin Laden, the Bush junta
would still be trying to explain such tricky matters as how it came to be
elected in the first place; Enron; its shameless favouring of the
already-too-rich; its reckless disregard for the world's poor, the ecology and a
raft of unilaterally abrogated international treaties. They might also have to
be telling us why they support
Israel
in its continuing disregard for UN resolutions. But bin Laden conveniently swept
all that under the carpet. The Bushies are riding high. Now 88 per cent of
Americans want the war, we are told. The
US
defence budget has been raised by another $ 60 billion to around $ 360 billion.
A splendid new generation of nuclear weapons is in the pipeline, so we can all
breathe easy. Quite what war 88 per cent of Americans think they are supporting
is a lot less clear. A war for how long, please? At what cost in American lives?
At what cost to the American taxpayer's pocket? At what cost -because most of
those 88 per cent are thoroughly decent and humane people -in Iraqi lives?
How Bush and his junta succeeded in deflecting
America
's
anger from bin Laden to Saddam Hussein is one of the great public relations
conjuring tricks of history. But they swung it. A recent poll tells us that one
in two Americans now believe Saddam was responsible for the attack on the World
Trade Centre. But the American public is not merely being misled.
It is being browbeaten and kept in a state of ignorance and fear. The
carefully orchestrated neurosis should carry Bush and his fellow conspirators
nicely into the next election. Those who are not with Mr Bush are against him.
Worse, they are with the enemy. Which is odd, because I'm dead against Bush, but
I would love to see Saddam's
downfall -just not on Bush's terms and not by his methods. And not under
the banner of such outrageous hypocrisy. The religious cant that will send
American troops into battle is perhaps the most sickening aspect of this surreal
war-to-be. Bush has an arm-lock on God. And God has very particular political
opinions. God appointed
America
to save the world in any way that suits
America
.
God appointed
Israel
to be the nexus of
America
's
Middle Eastern policy, and anyone who wants to mess with that idea is a)
anti-Semitic, b) anti-American, c) with the enemy, and d) a terrorist. God also
has pretty scary connections. In America, where all men are equal in His sight,
if not in one another's, the Bush family numbers one President, one
ex-President, one ex-head of the CIA, the Governor of Florida and the ex
Governor of Texas.
Care
for a few pointers? George W. Bush, 1978-84: senior executive, Arbusto
Energy/Bush
Exploration, an oil company; 1986-90: senior executive of the Harken oil
company. Dick Cheney, 1995-2000: chief executive of the Halliburton oil company.
Condoleezza Rice, 1991-2000: senior executive with the Chevron oil company,
which named an oil tanker after her. And so on. But one
of these trifling associations affects the integrity of God's work.
In
1993, while ex-President George Bush was visiting the ever-democratic
Kingdom
of
Kuwait
to receive thanks for liberating them, somebody tried to kill him. The CIA
believes that "somebody" was Saddam. Hence Bush Jr's cry:
"That man tried to kill my Daddy." But it's still not personal,
this war. It's still necessary. It's
still God's work. It's still about bringing freedom and democracy to oppressed
Iraqi people. To be a member of the team you must also believe in Absolute Good
and Absolute Evil, and Bush, with a lot of help from his friends, family and
God, is there to tell us which is which. What Bush won't tell us is the truth
about why we're going to war. What is at stake is not an Axis of Evil -but oil,
money and people's lives. Saddam's
misfortune is to sit on the second biggest oilfield in the world.
Bush wants it, and who helps him get it will receive a piece of the cake.
And who doesn't, won't. If
Saddam didn't have the oil, he could torture his citizens to his heart's
content. Other leaders do it every day - think
Saudi
Arabia
,
think
Pakistan
,
think
Turkey
,
think
Syria
,
think
Egypt
.
Baghdad
represents no clear and present danger to its neighbours, and none to the
US
or
Britain
.
Saddam's weapons of mass destruction, if he's still got them, will be peanuts by
comparison with the stuff
Israel
or
America
could hurl at him at five minutes' notice. What is at stake is not an imminent
military or terrorist threat, but the economic imperative of
US
growth. What is at stake is America's need to demonstrate its military power to
all of us -to Europe and Russia and China, and poor mad little North Korea, as
well as the Middle East; to show who rules America at home, and who is to be
ruled by America abroad.
The
most charitable interpretation of Tony Blair's part in all this is that he
believed that, by riding the tiger, he could steer it. He can't.
Instead, he gave it a phoney legitimacy, and a smooth voice. Now I fear,
the same tiger has him penned into a corner, and he can't get out.
It is utterly laughable that, at a time when Blair has talked himself
against the ropes, neither of
Britain
's
opposition leaders can lay a glove on him. But that's
Britain
's
tragedy, as it is
America
's:
as our Governments spin, lie and lose their credibility, the electorate simply
shrugs and looks the other way. Blair's best chance of personal survival must be
that, at the eleventh
hour, world protest and an improbably emboldened UN will force Bush to put his
gun back in his holster unfired. But what happens when the world's greatest
cowboy rides back into town without a tyrant's head to wave at the boys?
Blair's
worst chance is that, with or without the UN, he will drag us into a war that,
if the will to negotiate energetically had ever been there, could have been
avoided; a war that has been no more democratically debated in Britain than it
has in America or at the UN. By
doing so, Blair will have set back our relations with
Europe
and the
Middle
East
for decades to come. He will have helped to provoke unforeseeable retaliation,
great domestic unrest, and regional chaos in the
Middle
East
.
Welcome to the party of the ethical foreign policy.
There is a middle way, but it's a tough one: Bush dives in without UN
approval and Blair stays on the bank. Goodbye to the special relationship.
I cringe when I hear my Prime Minister lend his head prefect's
sophistries to this colonialist adventure. His
very real anxieties about terror are
shared
by all sane men. What he can't
explain is how he reconciles a global assault on al-Qaeda with a territorial
assault on
Iraq
.
We are in this war, if it takes place, to secure the fig leaf of our special
relationship, to grab our share of the oil pot, and because, after all the
public hand-holding in Washington and Camp David, Blair has to show up at the
altar.
"But
will we win, Daddy?"
"Of
course, child. It will all be over while you're still in bed."
"Why?"
"Because
otherwise Mr Bush's voters will get terribly impatient and may decide not to
vote for him."
"But
will people be killed, Daddy?"
"Nobody
you know, darling. Just foreign
people."
"Can
I watch it on television?"
"Only
if Mr Bush says you can."
"And
afterwards, will everything be normal again? Nobody will do anything horrid any
more?"
"Hush
child, and go to sleep."
Last
Friday a friend of mine in
California
drove to his local supermarket with a sticker on his car saying: "Peace is
also Patriotic". It was gone by
the time he'd finished shopping.
The
author has also contributed to an open Democracy debate on
Iraq
at
www.openDemocracy.net |